State v. Greene

476 S.W.3d 309, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1175, 2015 WL 7253051
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 17, 2015
DocketNo. ED 102598
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 476 S.W.3d 309 (State v. Greene) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Greene, 476 S.W.3d 309, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1175, 2015 WL 7253051 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Cletus Greene appeals from the judgment entered after a jury trial on his conviction for possession of a controlled substance. There was sufficient evidence to establish the chain of custody for the exhibit containing the Hiethamphetamine in this case and sufficient evidence of Greene’s knowledge that the drugs were in his actual possession. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cletus Greene v. State of Missouri
Supreme Court of Missouri, 2019

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
476 S.W.3d 309, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1175, 2015 WL 7253051, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-greene-moctapp-2015.