State v. Greene

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Greene

476 S.W.3d 309, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1175, 2015 WL 7253051

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 17, 2015·No. No. ED 102598·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Cletus Greene appeals from the judgment entered after a jury trial on his conviction for possession of a controlled substance. There was sufficient evidence to establish the chain of custody for the exhibit containing the Hiethamphetamine in this case and sufficient evidence of Greene’s knowledge that the drugs were in his actual possession. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Cletus Greene appeals from the judgment entered after a jury trial on his conviction for possession of a controlled substance. There was sufficient evidence to establish the chain of custody for the exhibit containing the Hiethamphetamine in this case and sufficient evidence of Greene’s knowledge that the drugs were in his actual possession. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Greene, 476 S.W.3d 309, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1175, 2015 WL 7253051 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

476 S.W.3d 309 (State v. Greene) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related