State v. Green, Unpublished Decision (12-12-2001)
Opinion
Appellant Derrick Green appeals from the trial court's declaration, following a sexual-predator hearing, that he is a sexually-oriented offender. Counsel appointed to prosecute this appeal submits that she has carefully examined the record of the proceedings below, and that her review of those proceedings has disclosed no error. She now requests that this court independently examine the record to determine whether this appeal is wholly frivolous.1
In 1988, Green was convicted of felonious assault, in violation of R.C.
Under the circumstances, Green's status as a sexually-oriented offender arose by operation of law.3 Thus, the classification of Green as a sexually-oriented offender is not properly appealable because it did not result from a judgment.4 In fact, the trial court's declaration that Green is a sexually-oriented offender is merely a redundancy. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed.
Further, a certified copy of this Judgment Entry shall constitute the mandate, which shall be sent to the trial court under App.R. 27. Costs shall be taxed under App.R. 24.
Hildebrandt, P.J., Doan and Winkler, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Green, Unpublished Decision (12-12-2001) (State v. Green, Unpublished Decision (12-12-2001)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.