State v. Green

CourtCourt of Appeals of South Carolina
DecidedJanuary 16, 2008
Docket2008-UP-061
StatusUnpublished

This text of State v. Green (State v. Green) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Green, (S.C. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Leonard Green A/K/A Leonard Greene Appellant.


Appeal From Allendale County
Perry M. Buckner, Circuit Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No.  2008-UP-061
Submitted January 2, 2008 – Filed January 16, 2008


APPEAL DISMISSED


Assistant Appellant Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, South Carolina Commission on Indigent Defense, Division of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliot, all of Columbia; and Solicitor I. McDuffie Stone, III, of Hampton, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Leonard Green appeals his convictions for first-degree burglary, kidnapping, and grand larceny, as well as his sentences of twenty-five years imprisonment for burglary, fifteen years for kidnapping, and five years for larceny.  Green argues the trial court erred in refusing to suppress evidence of the victim’s checkbook found at Green’s residence because the item was not listed with specificity in the search warrant.  After a thorough review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Green’s pro se brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Green’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ANDERSON, SHORT AND WILLIAMS, JJ., Concur.


[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
State v. Williams
406 S.E.2d 357 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State v. Green, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-green-scctapp-2008.