State v. Green

436 P.3d 97, 296 Or. App. 480
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedMarch 6, 2019
DocketA166466 (Control), A166521
StatusPublished

This text of 436 P.3d 97 (State v. Green) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Green, 436 P.3d 97, 296 Or. App. 480 (Or. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

*481In this consolidated criminal appeal, defendant seeks reversal of the trial court's imposition of $567 in court-appointed attorney fees in Case No. 17CR22672 and $690 in court-appointed attorney fees in Case No. 17CR38868. Defendant asserts, and the state concedes, that the trial court erred in imposing attorney fees in this case because it did not impose them in defendant's presence in *98open court. Instead, the imposition of attorney fees in the amounts listed above first occurred in the written judgments. We agree with the parties that the trial court erred when it imposed the attorney fees outside of defendant's presence.1 See State v. White , 269 Or. App. 255, 257, 344 P.3d 510 (2015) (reversing portion of judgment requiring payment of attorney fees where the trial court erred in imposing those fees in judgment but had not imposed them in open court); see also ORS 137.030 ("For the purpose of giving judgment, if the conviction is for *** [a] felony, the defendant shall be personally present.").2

Portion of judgments requiring defendant to pay attorney fees reversed; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. White
344 P.3d 255 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
436 P.3d 97, 296 Or. App. 480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-green-orctapp-2019.