State v. . Green

66 S.E. 564, 151 N.C. 729, 1909 N.C. LEXIS 356
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 23, 1909·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Criminal prosecution for failure to work the public roads, heard on appeal from a justice's court.

The facts are stated in the opinion. We have recently held, in S. v. Lunsford, 150 N.C. 862, that in every criminal prosecution, whether by indictment or warrant, or warrant taken in connection with the affidavit, the charge must be so stated as to show that a crime has been committed, and same must be described with sufficient certainty to inform the defendant of the nature *Page 700 of the accusation against him, and to enable the court to proceed to judgment in case of conviction.

In the present case, and under several decisions of the Court, the warrant is fatally defective in failing to allege that defendant was assigned to work the road described and failing to negative the payment of the one dollar allowed by the law in lieu of service. S. v. Neal,109 N.C. 859; S. v. Baker, 106 N.C. 758; S. v. Pool, 106 N.C. 698;S. v. Smith, 98 N.C. 747. The motion of defendant, therefore, must be allowed and judgment against him arrested.

Error.

Cited: S. v. Thomas, 169 N.C. 149.

(730)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. . Green, 66 S.E. 564, 151 N.C. 729, 1909 N.C. LEXIS 356 (N.C. 1909).

66 S.E. 564 (State v. . Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Billinger
714 S.E.2d 201 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2011)
State v. Gay
159 S.E.2d 312 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1968)
State v. Ingram
157 S.E.2d 119 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1967)
State v. Nugent
89 S.E.2d 781 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1955)
State v. Jenkins
77 S.E.2d 796 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)
State v. Albarty
76 S.E.2d 381 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)
State v. . McKeithan
166 S.E. 336 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932)