State v. Green

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Green

936 S.W.2d 867, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 13, 1997 WL 3348

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 7, 1997·No. No. 65687·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the judgment on his conviction by a jury of possession of a controlled substance in violation of § 195.202, RSMo 1994, for which he was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to a term of twenty years’ imprisonment. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the judgment on his conviction by a jury of possession of a controlled substance in violation of § 195.202, RSMo 1994, for which he was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to a term of twenty years’ imprisonment. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Green, 936 S.W.2d 867, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 13, 1997 WL 3348 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

936 S.W.2d 867 (State v. Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.