State v. Green

Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Green

21 N.W. 547, 32 Minn. 433, 1884 Minn. LEXIS 189

DecidedNovember 26, 1884

StatusPublished

This text of 21 N.W. 547 (State v. Green) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Green, 21 N.W. 547, 32 Minn. 433, 1884 Minn. LEXIS 189 (Mich. 1884).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

Upon trial before the municipal court without a jury, the defendant having been convicted of the crime of larceny, such conviction was not affected by the making and filing, several weeks afterwards, by the judge of that court, of a statement denominated by him “findings of fact” which did not set forth facts sufficient to constitute an offence. The finding of facts, if intended as such, subsequent to the conviction, was unauthorized, and the conviction is not referable to it.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

Upon trial before the municipal court without a jury, the defendant having been convicted of the crime of larceny, such conviction was not affected by the making and filing, several weeks afterwards, by the judge of that court, of a statement denominated by him “findings of fact” which did not set forth facts sufficient to constitute an offence. The finding of facts, if intended as such, subsequent to the conviction, was unauthorized, and the conviction is not referable to it.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 N.W. 547, 32 Minn. 433, 1884 Minn. LEXIS 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-green-minn-1884.