State v. Green

452 A.2d 974, 1982 Me. LEXIS 810
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedNovember 29, 1982
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 452 A.2d 974 (State v. Green) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Green, 452 A.2d 974, 1982 Me. LEXIS 810 (Me. 1982).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

Stephen Green appeals from his conviction on two counts of Burglary (Class C), 17-A M.R.S.A. § 401, following a jury trial in Superior Court, Penobscot County. Green claims that the presiding justice’s refusal to permit testimony attacking the reputation for truthfulness of a State’s witness, on the grounds that the proferred evidence was too remote, was an abuse of discretion requiring a reversal of his convictions.

It is a basic rule that the balancing of the probative value of evidence against its unfairly prejudicial effect rests within the sound discretion of the presiding justice. M.R.Evid. 403; State v. Lagasse, 410 A.2d 537, 541 (Me.1980). The record on appeal fails to convince us that the presiding justice’s ruling constituted an abuse of discretion.

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Sproul
544 A.2d 743 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
452 A.2d 974, 1982 Me. LEXIS 810, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-green-me-1982.