State v. Green

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Green

249 So. 2d 108, 258 La. 996, 1971 La. LEXIS 4232

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJune 7, 1971

DocketNo. 50925

StatusPublished

This text of 249 So. 2d 108 (State v. Green) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Green, 249 So. 2d 108, 258 La. 996, 1971 La. LEXIS 4232 (La. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

BARHAM, Justice.

Under a bill of information charging theft of property valued at $35.00, Robert Green was convicted and sentenced to 18 months in the penitentiary. He has appealed.

The six bills of exception which the minutes note were reserved were never perfected and are not included in the transcript.

* Under Code of Criminal Procedure Article 920 our review is therefore limited to an examination for error discoverable by mere inspection of the pleadings and proceedings. We find no such error.

The conviction and sentence are affirmed.

In brief filed in this court counsel for defendant argues only one alleged error, and in this connection lias attached to his brief a document entitled “Bill of Exception No. 5”, which has been signed by the judge. There is nothing to show when the bill was presented to and signed by the jddge, and since it was not filed in the record of appeal before us, we must assume that it was not timely perfected. We do not consider this bill. We note also, for the trial court’s future benefit, that although the minutes show that the defendant moved for and was granted an appeal, we find in the record no order of appeal or return date for the appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BARHAM, Justice.

Under a bill of information charging theft of property valued at $35.00, Robert Green was convicted and sentenced to 18 months in the penitentiary. He has appealed.

The six bills of exception which the minutes note were reserved were never perfected and are not included in the transcript.

* Under Code of Criminal Procedure Article 920 our review is therefore limited to an examination for error discoverable by mere inspection of the pleadings and proceedings. We find no such error.

The conviction and sentence are affirmed.

In brief filed in this court counsel for defendant argues only one alleged error, and in this connection lias attached to his brief a document entitled “Bill of Exception No. 5”, which has been signed by the judge. There is nothing to show when the bill was presented to and signed by the jddge, and since it was not filed in the record of appeal before us, we must assume that it was not timely perfected. We do not consider this bill. We note also, for the trial court’s future benefit, that although the minutes show that the defendant moved for and was granted an appeal, we find in the record no order of appeal or return date for the appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 So. 2d 108, 258 La. 996, 1971 La. LEXIS 4232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-green-la-1971.