State v. Gray

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Gray

987 P.2d 523, 160 Or. App. 653, 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 775

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedMay 19, 1999

DocketC97086354; CA A100085

StatusPublished

This text of 987 P.2d 523 (State v. Gray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Gray, 987 P.2d 523, 160 Or. App. 653, 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 775 (Or. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for one count of unlawful possession of a weapon. He assigns error to the trial court’s decision to permit him to represent himself at trial without first determining whether he knowingly and intentionally waived his right to representation. The state concedes that the record does not show that defendant knowingly and intentionally waived his right. We accept the concession.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for one count of unlawful possession of a weapon. He assigns error to the trial court’s decision to permit him to represent himself at trial without first determining whether he knowingly and intentionally waived his right to representation. The state concedes that the record does not show that defendant knowingly and intentionally waived his right. We accept the concession.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

987 P.2d 523, 160 Or. App. 653, 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-gray-orctapp-1999.