State v. Gray

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Gray

987 P.2d 523, 160 Or. App. 653, 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 775

Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided May 19, 1999·No. C97086354; CA A100085·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for one count of unlawful possession of a weapon. He assigns error to the trial court’s decision to permit him to represent himself at trial without first determining whether he knowingly and intentionally waived his right to representation. The state concedes that the record does not show that defendant knowingly and intentionally waived his right. We accept the concession.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for one count of unlawful possession of a weapon. He assigns error to the trial court’s decision to permit him to represent himself at trial without first determining whether he knowingly and intentionally waived his right to representation. The state concedes that the record does not show that defendant knowingly and intentionally waived his right. We accept the concession.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

State v. Gray, 987 P.2d 523, 160 Or. App. 653, 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 775 (Or. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

987 P.2d 523 (State v. Gray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.