State v. Gray

106 N.C. 734
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided February 15, 1890·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Shepherd, J.:

We are very clearly of the opinion that there was ample testimony to go to the jury upon the question of asportation. It is sufficient if the sheep were removed from the flock and were, even for an instant, under the control of the felon. State v. Green, 81 N. C, 561; State v. Jackson, 65 N. C., 305.

The testimony strongly tended to show these facts, and his Honor very properly refused to give the instruction asked for by the defendant.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Gray, 106 N.C. 734 (N.C. 1890).

106 N.C. 734 (State v. Gray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Murdock v. State
351 P.2d 674 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1960)
State v. Richards
284 P.2d 691 (Utah Supreme Court, 1955)
State v. Allen
189 P. 84 (Utah Supreme Court, 1920)