State v. Gray

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

State v. Gray

91 A. 787, 112 Me. 558, 1914 Me. LEXIS 80

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided September 1, 1914·Published

Opinion

The respondent was tried and found guilty of keeping a liquor nuisance. Thereupon he filed a motion in arrest of judgment which was overruled, and he now comes before the Law Court seeking to have that ruling reversed. But he has presented to this Court no bill of exceptions of any kind as required by statute, and therefore, his case is not properly before the Law Court, and cannot be considered by it. Dismissed from the law docket.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The respondent was tried and found guilty of keeping a liquor nuisance. Thereupon he filed a motion in arrest of judgment which was overruled, and he now comes before the Law Court seeking to have that ruling reversed. But he has presented to this Court no bill of exceptions of any kind as required by statute, and therefore, his case is not properly before the Law Court, and cannot be considered by it. Dismissed from the law docket.

State v. Gray, 91 A. 787, 112 Me. 558, 1914 Me. LEXIS 80 (Me. 1914).

Pincite

91 A. 787 (State v. Gray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.