State v. Graveley

Montana Supreme Court

State v. Graveley

527 P.2d 576, 165 Mont. 531

Montana Supreme Court·Decided May 22, 1974·No. No. 12700·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

It appearing from representation of counsel at oral argument herein that the dam in question has been constructed and that the acts complained of have been completed prior to entry of the district court’s judgment herein,

Ordered that this cause be remanded to the district court for such further action herein as to that court may appear appropriate.

MR. JUSTICE CASTLES, I would affirm the judgment of the lower court. MR. CHIEF JUSTICE JAMES T. HARRISON, deemed himself disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

It appearing from representation of counsel at oral argument herein that the dam in question has been constructed and that the acts complained of have been completed prior to entry of the district court’s judgment herein,

Ordered that this cause be remanded to the district court for such further action herein as to that court may appear appropriate.

MR. JUSTICE CASTLES, I would affirm the judgment of the lower court. MR. CHIEF JUSTICE JAMES T. HARRISON, deemed himself disqualified.

State v. Graveley, 527 P.2d 576, 165 Mont. 531 (Mo. 1974).

Pincite

527 P.2d 576 (State v. Graveley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.