State v. Gratz
97 A. 964, 88 N.J.L. 742, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 278
This text of 97 A. 964 (State v. Gratz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Gratz, 97 A. 964, 88 N.J.L. 742, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 278 (N.J. 1916).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance—Garrison, Swayze, Trenoi-iabd, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Vredenburgit, White, Teri-iune, HepPENHEIMER, WILLIAMS, TAYLOR, JJ. 12.
Fo reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Shoopman
90 A.2d 43 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
97 A. 964, 88 N.J.L. 742, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-gratz-nj-1916.