State v. Grantland

709 So. 2d 1317, 1998 Ala. LEXIS 15, 1998 WL 21978
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided January 23, 1998·No. 1961627·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We quash the writ as having been improvidently granted. In doing so, we do not wish to be understood as suggesting that the State should be permitted to use the writ of mandamus as a substitute for an appeal in a case where an appeal is not permitted. Ex parte Cannon, 369 So.2d 32, 33 (Ala.1978).

WRIT QUASHED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

HOOPER, C.J., and MADDOX, SHORES, KENNEDY, and BUTTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Grantland, 709 So. 2d 1317, 1998 Ala. LEXIS 15, 1998 WL 21978 (Ala. 1998).

709 So. 2d 1317 (State v. Grantland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte State
873 So. 2d 261 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2003)
State v. A.R.C.
873 So. 2d 261 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2003)