State v. Grantland

709 So. 2d 1317, 1998 Ala. LEXIS 15, 1998 WL 21978
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJanuary 23, 1998
Docket1961627
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 709 So. 2d 1317 (State v. Grantland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Grantland, 709 So. 2d 1317, 1998 Ala. LEXIS 15, 1998 WL 21978 (Ala. 1998).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We quash the writ as having been improvidently granted. In doing so, we do not wish to be understood as suggesting that the State should be permitted to use the writ of mandamus as a substitute for an appeal in a case where an appeal is not permitted. Ex parte Cannon, 369 So.2d 32, 33 (Ala.1978).

WRIT QUASHED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

HOOPER, C.J., and MADDOX, SHORES, KENNEDY, and BUTTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte State
873 So. 2d 261 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2003)
State v. A.R.C.
873 So. 2d 261 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
709 So. 2d 1317, 1998 Ala. LEXIS 15, 1998 WL 21978, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-grantland-ala-1998.