State v. Grant

• Court: Court of Appeals of South Carolina
• Decided: January 13, 2009
• Docket: 2009-UP-026
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent

v.

Kerry Nolan Grant, Appellant

---

Appeal from Aiken County
Thomas A. Russo, Circuit Court Judge

---

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-026
Submitted January 1, 2009 – Filed January 13, 2009

---

APPEAL DISMISSED

---

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Barbara R. Morgan, of Aiken, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Grant, appeals his convictions for grand larceny, burglary in the second degree, and two counts of ill treatment toward animals. He argues the trial court erred in denying his motion for a directed verdict where there was insufficient evidence of guilt. After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Grant’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Huff, Thomas, and Lockemy, JJ., concur.

---

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.