State v. Grant

Montana Supreme Court

State v. Grant

198 Mont. 6

CourtMontana Supreme Court

DecidedMay 12, 1982

DocketNo. 5658

StatusPublished

This text of 198 Mont. 6 (State v. Grant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Grant, 198 Mont. 6 (Mo. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

The application of the above-named defendant for a review of the sentence of 7 years imposed on December 24,1981, was fully heard and after a careful consideration of the entire matter it is decided that:

The sentence shall remain the same as originally imposed.

The sentencbg judge stated the reasons very clearly for the sentence imposed. The Defendant was first offered a deferred sentence which had to be revoked. Then she received a 7 year suspended sentence which also had to be revoked. The Defendant was clearly given every opportunity for rehabilitation but did not take advantage of her chances. Therefore this Division agrees with the sentence imposed by the sentencbg judge.

We wish to thank Bemie Zuroff of the Montana Defender Project for his assistance to the Defendant and to this Court.

SENTENCE REVIEW DIVISION

Leonard Langen, Chairman; Joseph Gary, James Salansky

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The application of the above-named defendant for a review of the sentence of 7 years imposed on December 24,1981, was fully heard and after a careful consideration of the entire matter it is decided that:

The sentence shall remain the same as originally imposed.

The sentencbg judge stated the reasons very clearly for the sentence imposed. The Defendant was first offered a deferred sentence which had to be revoked. Then she received a 7 year suspended sentence which also had to be revoked. The Defendant was clearly given every opportunity for rehabilitation but did not take advantage of her chances. Therefore this Division agrees with the sentence imposed by the sentencbg judge.

We wish to thank Bemie Zuroff of the Montana Defender Project for his assistance to the Defendant and to this Court.

SENTENCE REVIEW DIVISION

Leonard Langen, Chairman; Joseph Gary, James Salansky

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 Mont. 6, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-grant-mont-1982.