State v. Grant

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Grant

474 S.W.3d 604, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1143, 2015 WL 6928251

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 10, 2015

DocketNo. ED 102506

StatusPublished

This text of 474 S.W.3d 604 (State v. Grant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Grant, 474 S.W.3d 604, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1143, 2015 WL 6928251 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jeremy Grant (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment finding him guilty of one court of tampering with a motor vehicle. We have reviewed the briefs’ of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court did not err in denyihg Appellant’s motion to suppress evidence. State v. Grayson, 336 S.W.3d 138, 142 (Mo. banc 2011). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties -for their use only, We affirm the judgment pursuant to [605]*605Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b). .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jeremy Grant (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment finding him guilty of one court of tampering with a motor vehicle. We have reviewed the briefs’ of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court did not err in denyihg Appellant’s motion to suppress evidence. State v. Grayson, 336 S.W.3d 138, 142 (Mo. banc 2011). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties -for their use only, We affirm the judgment pursuant to [605]*605Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b). .

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

474 S.W.3d 604, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1143, 2015 WL 6928251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-grant-moctapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack