State v. Grant

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Grant

474 S.W.3d 604, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1143, 2015 WL 6928251

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 10, 2015·No. No. ED 102506·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jeremy Grant (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment finding him guilty of one court of tampering with a motor vehicle. We have reviewed the briefs’ of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court did not err in denyihg Appellant’s motion to suppress evidence. State v. Grayson, 336 S.W.3d 138, 142 (Mo. banc 2011). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties -for their use only, We affirm the judgment pursuant to [605] Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b). .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jeremy Grant (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment finding him guilty of one court of tampering with a motor vehicle. We have reviewed the briefs’ of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court did not err in denyihg Appellant’s motion to suppress evidence. State v. Grayson, 336 S.W.3d 138, 142 (Mo. banc 2011). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties -for their use only, We affirm the judgment pursuant to [605] Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b). .

State v. Grant, 474 S.W.3d 604, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1143, 2015 WL 6928251 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

474 S.W.3d 604 (State v. Grant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related