State v. Grant

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

State v. Grant

536 A.2d 619, 1988 Me. LEXIS 37

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided February 5, 1988·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Defendant Kevin L. Grant appeals from his conviction in the Superior Court (Penob-scot County) as an habitual motor vehicle offender. 29 M.R.S.A. § 2298 (Supp.1987). On appeal, Grant argues that the Superior Court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained from the investigatory stop of his motor vehicle. Upon a careful review of the record, we conclude that the Superior Court’s finding that the police officer had a reasonable suspicion to stop Grant was not clearly erroneous. See State v. Cyr, 501 A.2d 1303, 1305 (Me. 1985); State v. Griffin, 459 A.2d 1086, 1089 (Me.1983).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Defendant Kevin L. Grant appeals from his conviction in the Superior Court (Penob-scot County) as an habitual motor vehicle offender. 29 M.R.S.A. § 2298 (Supp.1987). On appeal, Grant argues that the Superior Court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained from the investigatory stop of his motor vehicle. Upon a careful review of the record, we conclude that the Superior Court’s finding that the police officer had a reasonable suspicion to stop Grant was not clearly erroneous. See State v. Cyr, 501 A.2d 1303, 1305 (Me. 1985); State v. Griffin, 459 A.2d 1086, 1089 (Me.1983).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

State v. Grant, 536 A.2d 619, 1988 Me. LEXIS 37 (Me. 1988).

Pincite

536 A.2d 619 (State v. Grant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related