State v. Grant

466 A.2d 27, 1983 Me. LEXIS 812
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Grant. Read the opinion of the Court — 1985 Me. LEXIS 629
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided October 5, 1983·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

After a jury trial in the Superior Court (Penobscot County) the defendant, James Grant, appeals from his conviction on March 30,1983 for reckless conduct with the use of a dangerous weapon (17-A M.R.S.A. §§ 211, 1252(4) (1983). As the single issue on appeal, the defendant contends that it was error for the presiding justice to refuse to instruct the jury that defendant must have intended to use his motor vehicle as a dangerous weapon in order to convict him of reckless conduct with the use of a dangerous weapon. We recently rejected this contention in State v. Seymour, 461 A.2d 1060 (Me.1983) and we do so again here.

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Grant, 466 A.2d 27, 1983 Me. LEXIS 812 (Me. 1983).

466 A.2d 27 (State v. Grant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Seymour
461 A.2d 1060 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1983)