State v. Grandchamp

Montana Supreme Court

State v. Grandchamp

152 Mont. 33

Montana Supreme Court·Decided October 2, 1968·Published

Opinion

DECISION

The application of the above-named defendant for a review of the sentence of 4 years, imposed on April 5, 1968, was fully heard and after a careful consideration of the entire matter is is decided that:

(1) No change will be made in the sentence heretofore imposed.

The reason for the above decision: A careful consideration of the evidence offered is not deemed sufficient to justify any change in the sentence heretofore imposed and, therefore, the Petition is denied.

SENTENCE REVIEW DIVISION Victor H. Fall, chairman; Philip C. Duncan, Paul G. Hatfield.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DECISION

The application of the above-named defendant for a review of the sentence of 4 years, imposed on April 5, 1968, was fully heard and after a careful consideration of the entire matter is is decided that:

(1) No change will be made in the sentence heretofore imposed.

The reason for the above decision: A careful consideration of the evidence offered is not deemed sufficient to justify any change in the sentence heretofore imposed and, therefore, the Petition is denied.

SENTENCE REVIEW DIVISION Victor H. Fall, chairman; Philip C. Duncan, Paul G. Hatfield.

State v. Grandchamp, 152 Mont. 33 (Mo. 1968).

Pincite

152 Mont. 33 (State v. Grandchamp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.