State v. Grajczyk

2016 ND 180
North Dakota Supreme Court·Decided September 15, 2016·No. 20160034·Published

Opinion

Filed 9/15/16 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2016 ND 180

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Desilee Lori Grajczyk, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20160034

Appeal from the District Court of Ward County, North Central Judicial District, the Honorable Douglas L. Mattson, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Marie A. Miller, Ward County Assistant State’s Attorney, P.O. Box 5005, Minot, N.D. 58702-5005, for plaintiff and appellee.

Benjamin C. Pulkrabek, 402 First Street Northwest, Mandan, N.D. 58554-

3118, for defendant and appellant.

State v. Grajczyk

No. 20160034

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Desilee Grajczyk appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found her guilty of possession of methamphetamine with intent to deliver, possession of marijuana with intent to deliver and possession of drug paraphernalia .  Grajczyk argues the district court erred in giving the jury the current North Dakota pattern jury instruction on direct and circumstantial evidence and contends the State committed obvious error when purportedly commenting on the defendant’s right to remain silent in closing argument.   We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7).   See State v. Nakvinda , 2011 ND 217, ¶ 17, 807 N.W.2d 204; State v. Noorlun , 2005 ND 189, ¶ 20, 705 N.W.2d 819.

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Daniel J. Crothers

Dale V. Sandstrom

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Lisa Fair McEvers

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Grajczyk, 2016 ND 180 (N.D. 2016).

2016 ND 180 (State v. Grajczyk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Noorlun
2005 ND 189 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2005)
State v. Nakvinda
2011 ND 217 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2011)
State v. Nakvinda
2011 ND 217 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2011)