State v. Graham

571 So. 2d 1269, 1990 Ala. LEXIS 948, 1990 WL 212375
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided October 26, 1990·No. 89-1024·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MADDOX, Justice.

By quashing the writ, we should not be understood as approving or disapproving the language used, or the statements of law contained, in the opinion of the Court of Criminal Appeals. 571 So.2d 1267. Cf. Cooper v. State, 287 Ala. 728, 252 So.2d 108 (1971).

WRIT QUASHED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and ALMON, ADAMS and STEAGALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Graham, 571 So. 2d 1269, 1990 Ala. LEXIS 948, 1990 WL 212375 (Ala. 1990).

571 So. 2d 1269 (State v. Graham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Spivey
675 So. 2d 1335 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1994)