Home/Missouri Court of Appeals/State v. Grady

State v. Grady

245 S.W.3d 254, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 175, 2008 WL 304912
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 5, 2008
DocketED 89038
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 245 S.W.3d 254 (State v. Grady) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Grady, 245 S.W.3d 254, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 175, 2008 WL 304912 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Gus Grady, appeals from the judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of forcible sodomy, two counts of assault in the first degree and armed criminal action. On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court plainly erred by permitting the prosecutor to ask improper questions during voir dire.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. McKenzie
245 S.W.3d 254 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
245 S.W.3d 254, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 175, 2008 WL 304912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-grady-moctapp-2008.