State v. Goyette
This text of 542 A.2d 1257 (State v. Goyette) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
Robert “Bubba” Goyette appeals from his conviction by a Superior Court jury (Androscoggin County) of Class C burglary, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 401 (1983), and Class E theft, id. § 353. Goyette fails to establish any abuse of discretion by the presiding justice in permitting the State to introduce under M.R.Evid. 609 evidence of three prior convictions solely for the purpose of impeaching Goyette’s credibility as a witness. See State v. Hanscome, 459 A.2d 569, 572-73 (Me.1983). Goyette also fails in his argument based on a claimed inconsistency between Goyette’s guilty verdict and the not guilty verdict given by the same jury to his codefendant tried along with him; the evidence implicating Goyette differed in significant respects from that implicating his codefendant.
The entry is:
Judgment affirmed.
All concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
542 A.2d 1257, 1988 Me. LEXIS 191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-goyette-me-1988.