Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/State v. Gover

State v. Gover

530 P.2d 1271, 20 Or. App. 226, 1975 Ore. App. LEXIS 1588
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedJanuary 27, 1975
DocketNo. C-74-03-0721
StatusPublished

This text of 530 P.2d 1271 (State v. Gover) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Gover, 530 P.2d 1271, 20 Or. App. 226, 1975 Ore. App. LEXIS 1588 (Or. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, having been convicted of burglary in the first degree, ORS 164.225, appeals, contending that he was deprived of due process by comments the [227]*227trial judge made in the presence of the jury regarding defendant’s counsel. There is no merit to this contention. Hindman v. Coy, 207 Or 279, 286, 295 P2d 1097 (1956); State v. Jorgensen, 8 Or App 1, 492 P2d 312 (1971), Sup Ct review denied (1972).

Defendant made two other assignments of error. One he abandoned at oral argument before this court; the other does not warrant discussion.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hindman v. Coy
295 P.2d 1097 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1956)
State v. Jorgensen
492 P.2d 312 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
530 P.2d 1271, 20 Or. App. 226, 1975 Ore. App. LEXIS 1588, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-gover-orctapp-1975.