State v. Goudalock

Supreme Court of South Carolina

State v. Goudalock

3 S.C.L. 47

DecidedApril 15, 1801

StatusPublished

This text of 3 S.C.L. 47 (State v. Goudalock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Goudalock, 3 S.C.L. 47 (S.C. 1801).

Pincite

Opinion

The court considered the conviction insufficient to warrant judgment, as the court, before whom the defendant was tried, had not jurisdiction in the case: and for as much as the conviction was founded on mistake ; and that mistake apparent on the face of the proceedings, the judgment was ordered to be arrested. And it waS ordered, that the defendant should be prosecuted de novo, for the* same offence, on the same indictment, in the' district within which-' the offence was committed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The court considered the conviction insufficient to warrant judgment, as the court, before whom the defendant was tried, had not jurisdiction in the case: and for as much as the conviction was founded on mistake ; and that mistake apparent on the face of the proceedings, the judgment was ordered to be arrested. And it waS ordered, that the defendant should be prosecuted de novo, for the* same offence, on the same indictment, in the' district within which-' the offence was committed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 S.C.L. 47, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-goudalock-sc-1801.