State v. Gordon

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Gordon

2017 Ohio 7843, 150 Ohio St. 3d 1441

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 27, 2017

Docket2017-1122

StatusPublished

This text of 2017 Ohio 7843 (State v. Gordon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Gordon, 2017 Ohio 7843, 150 Ohio St. 3d 1441 (Ohio 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Summit App. No. 28191, 2017-Ohio-5796. On review of an order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are ordered to brief the issue stated at page 1 of the court of appeals’ entry filed August 8, 2017: ‘Whether the post-release control notification of R.C. 2929.19(B)(2)(e) must include notification of the penalty provisions in R.C. 2929.141(A)(1)-(2), speeifi-eally, whether a trial court must inform an offender at the time of sentencing that the commission of a felony during a period of post-release control permits a trial court to impose a new prison term for the violation to be served consecutively with any prison term for the new felony.”

The conflict case is State v. Johnson, 5th Dist. Muskingum No. CT2016-0035, 2016-Ohio-7931.

It is ordered by the court that the clerk shall issue an order for the transmittal of the record from the court of appeals for Summit County.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Summit App. No. 28191, 2017-Ohio-5796. On review of an order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are ordered to brief the issue stated at page 1 of the court of appeals’ entry filed August 8, 2017: ‘Whether the post-release control notification of R.C. 2929.19(B)(2)(e) must include notification of the penalty provisions in R.C. 2929.141(A)(1)-(2), speeifi-eally, whether a trial court must inform an offender at the time of sentencing that the commission of a felony during a period of post-release control permits a trial court to impose a new prison term for the violation to be served consecutively with any prison term for the new felony.”

The conflict case is State v. Johnson, 5th Dist. Muskingum No. CT2016-0035, 2016-Ohio-7931.

It is ordered by the court that the clerk shall issue an order for the transmittal of the record from the court of appeals for Summit County.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2017 Ohio 7843, 150 Ohio St. 3d 1441, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-gordon-ohio-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack