State v. Gordon

182 S.E.2d 14, 12 N.C. App. 38, 1971 N.C. App. LEXIS 1275
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided July 14, 1971·No. No. 7117SC406·Published

Opinion

HEDRICK, Judge.

By his one assignment of error, the defendant contends that the trial judge violated the provisions of G.S. 1-180 in his charge to the jury by failing to give equal stress to the contentions of the defendant and the State. Although the defendant cross-examined the State’s witnesses, he presented no evidence of his own.

Prom a careful reading of the charge in light of the fact that all of the evidence offered at the trial was presented by the State, it is our opinion that the court did not violate the requirements of G.S. 1-180, but gave adequate stress to the contentions of the defendant and the State. State v. Smith, 238 N.C. 82, 76 S.E. 2d 363 (1953) ; State v. Roman, 235 N.C. 627, 70 S.E. 2d 857 (1952).

In the trial below we find no error.

No error.

Chief Judge Mallard and Judge Campbell concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Gordon, 182 S.E.2d 14, 12 N.C. App. 38, 1971 N.C. App. LEXIS 1275 (N.C. Ct. App. 1971).

182 S.E.2d 14 (State v. Gordon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Roman
70 S.E.2d 857 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1952)
State v. Smith
76 S.E.2d 363 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)