State v. Gordon

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Gordon

107 So. 2d 401

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 8, 1958

DocketNo. 995

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 107 So. 2d 401 (State v. Gordon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Gordon, 107 So. 2d 401 (Fla. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner having filed in this Court a suggestion for the issuance of a writ of prohibition and applied for a rule nisi thereon, and the Court having considered the suggestion and argument of counsel, it is

Ordered and adjudged that the application for rule nisi be and the same is hereby denied, and the suggestion for writ of prohibition is hereby dismissed, for the reasons that the Circuit Judge sought to be prohibited is not made a party to these proceedings, and the petitioner has failed to comply with the provisions of Section 80.06, Florida Statutes 1957, F.S.A., and Rule 4.5, subd. d, Florida Appellate Rules, 31 F.S.A. The dismissal of the suggestion is not to be considered as a determination by the Court of the merits of this cause, and the Court suggests that if further proceedings are contemplated, consideration be given to the opinions of the Supreme Court of Florida in the cases of Groover v. Walker, Fla.1956, 88 So.2d 312, and Robinson v. Great Southern Trucking Company, Fla. 1957, 95 So.2d 418.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner having filed in this Court a suggestion for the issuance of a writ of prohibition and applied for a rule nisi thereon, and the Court having considered the suggestion and argument of counsel, it is

Ordered and adjudged that the application for rule nisi be and the same is hereby denied, and the suggestion for writ of prohibition is hereby dismissed, for the reasons that the Circuit Judge sought to be prohibited is not made a party to these proceedings, and the petitioner has failed to comply with the provisions of Section 80.06, Florida Statutes 1957, F.S.A., and Rule 4.5, subd. d, Florida Appellate Rules, 31 F.S.A. The dismissal of the suggestion is not to be considered as a determination by the Court of the merits of this cause, and the Court suggests that if further proceedings are contemplated, consideration be given to the opinions of the Supreme Court of Florida in the cases of Groover v. Walker, Fla.1956, 88 So.2d 312, and Robinson v. Great Southern Trucking Company, Fla. 1957, 95 So.2d 418.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

107 So. 2d 401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-gordon-fladistctapp-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack