State v. Gooler

344 N.W.2d 404, 1984 Minn. LEXIS 1252
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided February 24, 1984·No. No. C9-83-1145·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

This is a sentencing appeal raising an issue concerning the propriety of a dura-tional departure imposed but not executed by the sentencing court following revocation of a stay of imposition of sentence. The parties agree that the presumptive sentence for the offense (attempted burglary) by a person with defendant’s criminal history score at the time of the original sentencing (zero) is 1 year and 1 day stayed. The trial court, in imposing a 2'/2-year sentence did not give any reasons for the departure. Further, as the state concedes in its brief, the record on appeal does not support the departure. Under the circumstances, we reduce defendant’s sentence duration from 2V2 years to 1 year and 1 day.

Affirmed as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Gooler, 344 N.W.2d 404, 1984 Minn. LEXIS 1252 (Mich. 1984).

344 N.W.2d 404 (State v. Gooler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Mattson
356 N.W.2d 391 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1984)