State v. Goodwater
This text of 414 S.W.3d 675 (State v. Goodwater) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Paul Goodwater appeals from his convictions following a jury trial for twenty counts of possession of child pornography, section 573.037, RSMo Cum.Supp.2012. In his sole point on appeal, he claims that the trial court abused its discretion in excluding the proposed testimony of eleven witnesses that he had repaired their computers and had backed up their files as part of the process. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
The judgment of convictions is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
414 S.W.3d 675, 2013 WL 6069277, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-goodwater-moctapp-2013.