State v. Goodwater

414 S.W.3d 675, 2013 WL 6069277, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1379
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 19, 2013·No. No. WD 75441·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Paul Goodwater appeals from his convictions following a jury trial for twenty counts of possession of child pornography, section 573.037, RSMo Cum.Supp.2012. In his sole point on appeal, he claims that the trial court abused its discretion in excluding the proposed testimony of eleven witnesses that he had repaired their computers and had backed up their files as part of the process. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment of convictions is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Goodwater, 414 S.W.3d 675, 2013 WL 6069277, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1379 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

414 S.W.3d 675 (State v. Goodwater) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Goodwater v. State
560 S.W.3d 44 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2018)