State v. Good

833 P.2d 1384, 114 Or. App. 412, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 1486
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided July 22, 1992·No. 91-03-34078; CA A69657·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In this misdemeanor case, the state concedes that the trial court erred in executing a portion of a 90-day jail sentence and simultaneously placing defendant on probation. State v. McMellon, 110 Or App 441, 443, 823 P2d 926 (1992). State v. Vasby, 110 Or App 1, 5, 788 P2d 1024 (1990). We accept the concession.

Conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Good, 833 P.2d 1384, 114 Or. App. 412, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 1486 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).

833 P.2d 1384 (State v. Good) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. McMellon
823 P.2d 996 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1992)
State v. Russell
823 P.2d 921 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 1991)
State v. Tapp
821 P.2d 1098 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1991)
State v. Vasby
788 P.2d 1024 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1990)