State v. Gonzalez
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
3 Plaintiff-Appellee,
4 v. NO. A-1-CA-36475
5 GABRIEL GONZALEZ,
6 Defendant-Appellant.
7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN JUAN COUNTY 8 Daylene Marsh, District Judge
9 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General 10 Santa Fe, NM
11 for Appellee
12 Gary C. Mitchell 13 Ruidoso, NM
14 for Appellant
15 MEMORANDUM OPINION
16 VIGIL, Judge. 1 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of
2 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has
3 been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
4 {2} AFFIRMED.
5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
6 _______________________________ 7 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
8 WE CONCUR:
9 _________________________________ 10 LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge
11 _________________________________ 12 JENNIFER L. ATTREP, Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Gonzalez (State v. Gonzalez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.