State v. Gonzalez
141 A.3d 294, 226 N.J. 209
Opinion
It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.
The Court agrees with the Appellate Division’s conclusion that the use of “and/or” in the jury instruction in this case injected ambiguity into the charge. See State v. Gonzalez, 444 N.J.Super. 62, 75-76, 130 A.3d 1250 (App.Div.2016). The criticism of the use of “and/or” is limited to the circumstances in which it was used in this case. Id. at 71-72, 130 A.3d 1250.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Gonzalez, 141 A.3d 294, 226 N.J. 209 (N.J. 2016).
141 A.3d 294 (State v. Gonzalez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State of New Jersey v. Ebenezer Byrd, Jerry J. Spraulding, and Gregory A. Jean-Baptiste
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2024
STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. MICHAEL CAWLEY (08-12-2127, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED)
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2021
STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. IBILOLA IGHAMA-AMEGOR A-0374-17T1 (14-06-0082, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2020
STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. STEVEN P. RINCK (13-02-0373, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2018