State v. Gonzalez

141 A.3d 294, 226 N.J. 209
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 24, 2016·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.

The Court agrees with the Appellate Division’s conclusion that the use of “and/or” in the jury instruction in this case injected ambiguity into the charge. See State v. Gonzalez, 444 N.J.Super. 62, 75-76, 130 A.3d 1250 (App.Div.2016). The criticism of the use of “and/or” is limited to the circumstances in which it was used in this case. Id. at 71-72, 130 A.3d 1250.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Gonzalez, 141 A.3d 294, 226 N.J. 209 (N.J. 2016).

141 A.3d 294 (State v. Gonzalez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related