State v. Gonzalez-Monasterio

Supreme Court of New Jersey

State v. Gonzalez-Monasterio

157 A.3d 414, 228 N.J. 335

DecidedMarch 27, 2017

StatusPublished

This text of 157 A.3d 414 (State v. Gonzalez-Monasterio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Gonzalez-Monasterio, 157 A.3d 414, 228 N.J. 335 (N.J. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

This matter having been duly considered by the Court;

It is ORDERED that to provide guidance to the trial court on remand, the Appellate Division’s decision is summarily modified as follows. The trial court did not err — as the Appellate Division concluded — in instructing the jury on principles of accomplice liability concerning the charge of hindering apprehension, N.J.S.A. 2C:29-3.

The Court having determined that certification was improvidently granted as to all other issues presented in this appeal;

It is ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This matter having been duly considered by the Court;

It is ORDERED that to provide guidance to the trial court on remand, the Appellate Division’s decision is summarily modified as follows. The trial court did not err — as the Appellate Division concluded — in instructing the jury on principles of accomplice liability concerning the charge of hindering apprehension, N.J.S.A. 2C:29-3.

The Court having determined that certification was improvidently granted as to all other issues presented in this appeal;

It is ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

157 A.3d 414, 228 N.J. 335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-gonzalez-monasterio-nj-2017.