State v. GONZALEZ-GUZMAN

266 P.3d 220, 173 Wash. 2d 1006, 2012 WL 37063, 2012 Wash. LEXIS 52
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 4, 2012
Docket86090-4
StatusPublished

This text of 266 P.3d 220 (State v. GONZALEZ-GUZMAN) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. GONZALEZ-GUZMAN, 266 P.3d 220, 173 Wash. 2d 1006, 2012 WL 37063, 2012 Wash. LEXIS 52 (Wash. 2012).

Opinion

266 P.3d 220 (2012)

STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Sergio GONZALEZ-GUZMAN, Petitioner.

No. 86090-4.

Supreme Court of Washington.

January 4, 2012.

ORDER

¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Madsen and Justices C. Johnson, Owens, J.M. Johnson and Wiggins, considered this matter at its January 4, 2012, Motion Calendar and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the Petitioner's Motion for Discretionary Review is granted. The Court of Appeals order, which denied the Petitioner's motion for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal, is vacated. This matter is remanded to the Court of Appeals which is directed to grant the Petitioner's motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal.

/s/ Madsen, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
266 P.3d 220, 173 Wash. 2d 1006, 2012 WL 37063, 2012 Wash. LEXIS 52, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-gonzalez-guzman-wash-2012.