State v. Gonzalez
822 A.2d 242, 263 Conn. 913, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 178
This text of 822 A.2d 242 (State v. Gonzalez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Gonzalez, 822 A.2d 242, 263 Conn. 913, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 178 (Colo. 2003).
Opinion
The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 75 Conn. App. 364 (AC 22374), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the improper admission of the challenged constancy of accusation testimony constitute harmful error?”
NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gonzalez v. Commissioner of Correction
999 A.2d 781 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2010)
State v. Gonzalez
864 A.2d 847 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2005)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
822 A.2d 242, 263 Conn. 913, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-gonzalez-conn-2003.