State v. Gonzales

41 S.W.3d 553, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 95, 2001 WL 50709
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 23, 2001
DocketNo. WD 58139
StatusPublished

This text of 41 S.W.3d 553 (State v. Gonzales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Gonzales, 41 S.W.3d 553, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 95, 2001 WL 50709 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

[554]*554 Order

PER CURIAM:

Maria Gonzales appeals her conviction of the offense of second degree robbery. She contends on appeal that the trial court erred in admitting testimony identifying her as the person committing the offense. She contends that the identifications were tainted by unduly suggestive procedures and were unreliable.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
41 S.W.3d 553, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 95, 2001 WL 50709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-gonzales-moctapp-2001.