State v. Gonzales
354 So. 2d 949
Opinion
This cause is before this Court on certification under Rule 4.6, F.A.R. by the Circuit Court of Alachua County, sitting as an appellate court, in an appeal from a county court. The rule does not provide for certification under these circumstances. American Express Company v. Habersin Camera Shops, Inc., 209 So.2d 283 (3d DCA 1968).
The question certified is not properly before us and is hereby DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Gonzales, 354 So. 2d 949 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).
354 So. 2d 949 (State v. Gonzales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
American Express Co. v. Habersin Camera Shops, Inc.
209 So. 2d 283 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)