State v. Gomez

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Gomez

882 S.W.2d 733, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1352, 1994 WL 449746

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Gomez. Read the opinion of the Court — 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1624 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 23, 1994·No. Nos. 61852, 64583·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Pablo Gomez, appeals from his convictions of burglary in the first degree, four counts of assault in the first degree and four counts of armed criminal action. He [734]*734also appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. Finding no error, we affirm. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum setting forth reasons for our decision.

Judgment and sentence affirmed pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Pablo Gomez, appeals from his convictions of burglary in the first degree, four counts of assault in the first degree and four counts of armed criminal action. He [734]*734also appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. Finding no error, we affirm. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum setting forth reasons for our decision.

Judgment and sentence affirmed pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

State v. Gomez, 882 S.W.2d 733, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1352, 1994 WL 449746 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

882 S.W.2d 733 (State v. Gomez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.