State v. Gomez
This text of State v. Gomez (State v. Gomez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0000642 09-JUL-2015 08:48 AM
SCWC-12-0000642
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI
STATE OF HAWAIʻI, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
CRAIG A. GOMEZ, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-12-0000642; CASE NO. 1DTC-12-040907)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Pollack, McKenna, and Wilson, JJ.)
Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Craig A. Gomez’s
Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on May 28, 2015, is
hereby accepted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be
scheduled in this case at this time. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate
Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, July 9, 2015.
James S. Tabe /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Gomez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-gomez-haw-2015.