State v. Gomez
419 So. 2d 422, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21173
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 21, 1982·No. No. 82-279·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We find no abuse of the trial court’s discretion in dismissing the information with prejudice because, as it found, the state’s inexcusably tardy and inadequate compliance with an order requiring a bill of particulars had adversely affected the defendant’s ability to prepare for trial. See and compare, Leeman v. State, 357 So.2d 703 (Fla.1978) (trial court found no prejudice in non-compliance with order).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Gomez, 419 So. 2d 422, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21173 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).
419 So. 2d 422 (State v. Gomez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Del Gaudio
445 So. 2d 605 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
State v. McCloud
431 So. 2d 694 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)