State v. Gomez

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Gomez

419 So. 2d 422, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21173

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 21, 1982

DocketNo. 82-279

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 419 So. 2d 422 (State v. Gomez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Gomez, 419 So. 2d 422, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21173 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no abuse of the trial court’s discretion in dismissing the information with prejudice because, as it found, the state’s inexcusably tardy and inadequate compliance with an order requiring a bill of particulars had adversely affected the defendant’s ability to prepare for trial. See and compare, Leeman v. State, 357 So.2d 703 (Fla.1978) (trial court found no prejudice in non-compliance with order).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We find no abuse of the trial court’s discretion in dismissing the information with prejudice because, as it found, the state’s inexcusably tardy and inadequate compliance with an order requiring a bill of particulars had adversely affected the defendant’s ability to prepare for trial. See and compare, Leeman v. State, 357 So.2d 703 (Fla.1978) (trial court found no prejudice in non-compliance with order).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

419 So. 2d 422, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-gomez-fladistctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack