Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State v. Goldsmith

State v. Goldsmith

2009 Ohio 4906, 914 N.E.2d 1052, 123 Ohio St. 3d 162
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 22, 2009
Docket2009-0001
StatusPublished

This text of 2009 Ohio 4906 (State v. Goldsmith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Goldsmith, 2009 Ohio 4906, 914 N.E.2d 1052, 123 Ohio St. 3d 162 (Ohio 2009).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Harris, 122 Ohio St.3d 373, 2009-Ohio-3323, 911 N.E.2d 882.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. *163 William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Kristen L. Sobieski, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Antonio Goldsmith, pro se.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Harris
2009 Ohio 3323 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2009 Ohio 4906, 914 N.E.2d 1052, 123 Ohio St. 3d 162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-goldsmith-ohio-2009.