State v. Goldsmith

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Goldsmith

2009 Ohio 4906, 914 N.E.2d 1052, 123 Ohio St. 3d 162

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 22, 2009·No. 2009-0001·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Harris, 122 Ohio St.3d 373, 2009-Ohio-3323, 911 N.E.2d 882.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. *163 William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Kristen L. Sobieski, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Antonio Goldsmith, pro se.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Harris, 122 Ohio St.3d 373, 2009-Ohio-3323, 911 N.E.2d 882.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. *163 William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Kristen L. Sobieski, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Antonio Goldsmith, pro se.

State v. Goldsmith, 2009 Ohio 4906, 914 N.E.2d 1052, 123 Ohio St. 3d 162 (Ohio 2009).

Pincite

2009 Ohio 4906 (State v. Goldsmith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related