State v. Goldbert
17 A.2d 173, 125 N.J.L. 501, 1940 N.J. LEXIS 367
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Case in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Bodine, Perskie, Porter, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Hague, JJ. 7.
For reversal — The Chancellor, Ciitee Justice, Parker, Donges, JJ. 4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Goldbert, 17 A.2d 173, 125 N.J.L. 501, 1940 N.J. LEXIS 367 (N.J. 1940).
17 A.2d 173 (State v. Goldbert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State ex rel. C.P. & R.D.
514 A.2d 850 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1986)
State in Interest of CP & RD
514 A.2d 850 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1986)
Peyton v. Nord
437 P.2d 716 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1968)
State v. Naylor
207 A.2d 1 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1965)
Johnson v. State
114 A.2d 1 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1955)
State v. Monahan
104 A.2d 21 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1954)
State v. Maier
99 A.2d 21 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1953)
Wade v. Warden of State Prison
73 A.2d 128 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1950)