State v. Goff

Supreme Court of South Carolina

State v. Goff

409 S.E.2d 361, 305 S.C. 374, 1991 S.C. LEXIS 182

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedSeptember 9, 1991

Docket23466

StatusPublished

This text of 409 S.E.2d 361 (State v. Goff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Goff, 409 S.E.2d 361, 305 S.C. 374, 1991 S.C. LEXIS 182 (S.C. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Appellant’s magistrate’s court conviction was reversed by the circuit court. The circuit court’s original order did not remand the case for a new trial. The parties are confused whether appellant can be retried. We hold that he may be regardless of the omission of the word "remand.” See Hamm v. Southern Bell, — S.C. —, 406 S.E. (2d) 157 (1991); State v. Wyse, 33 S.C. 582, 12 S.E. 556 (1891).'In light of our holding, we need not reach the remaining issue raised by appellant.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Appellant’s magistrate’s court conviction was reversed by the circuit court. The circuit court’s original order did not remand the case for a new trial. The parties are confused whether appellant can be retried. We hold that he may be regardless of the omission of the word "remand.” See Hamm v. Southern Bell, — S.C. —, 406 S.E. (2d) 157 (1991); State v. Wyse, 33 S.C. 582, 12 S.E. 556 (1891).'In light of our holding, we need not reach the remaining issue raised by appellant.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

409 S.E.2d 361, 305 S.C. 374, 1991 S.C. LEXIS 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-goff-sc-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack