State v. Goff
This text of 803 P.2d 290 (State v. Goff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant appeals his conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants. ORS 813.010. Earlier he had pleaded guilty to failure to perform the duties of a driver involved in an accident. ORS 811.700. Both charges arose from the same act of driving. Defendant’s motion to dismiss on former jeopardy grounds under ORS 131.505 et seq and the United States and Oregon Constitutions was denied. The state concedes error. We accept the concession. State v. Farley, 301 Or 668, 725 P2d 359 (1986).
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
803 P.2d 290, 105 Or. App. 165, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-goff-orctapp-1991.