State v. Goff

117 N.W.2d 319, 174 Neb. 217, 1962 Neb. LEXIS 129
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 5, 1962
DocketNo. 35316
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 117 N.W.2d 319 (State v. Goff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Goff, 117 N.W.2d 319, 174 Neb. 217, 1962 Neb. LEXIS 129 (Neb. 1962).

Opinion

Boslaugh, J.

The defendant was convicted and sentenced for possession of narcotics in violation of section 28-470, R. R. S. 1943. Within the time prescribed by statute the defendant filed a notice of appeal in the office of the clerk of the district court which failed to “state the nature of the offense and the sentence imposed” as required by section 25-1912, R. S. Supp., 1961. The State has moved [218]*218to dismiss the appeal for the reason that the notice of appeal failed to comply with the statute.

It is necessary that this court know the nature of the offense and the sentence imposed before a suspension of the execution can be ordered in a proper case. For that reason section 25-1912, R. S. Supp., 1961, requires that a statement of the nature of the offense and the sentence imposed be included in a notice of appeal filed in a criminal case.

The statute, which formerly applied to only civil actions, was amended in 1941 to simplify the procedure for perfecting an appeal from the district court to this court. It provides that no step other than the filing of a notice of appeal and the payment of the docket fee (or the filing of an affidavit of poverty as provided in section 29-2306, R. S. Supp., 1961, in lieu of the payment of the docket fee) shall be jurisdictional. We do not believe that a defendant in a criminal action should be denied a review of his conviction and sentence in this court because of a failure to comply with a procedural requirement relating to a suspension of execution of the sentence.

The motion is overruled.

Motion to dismiss overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Carr
147 N.W.2d 619 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
117 N.W.2d 319, 174 Neb. 217, 1962 Neb. LEXIS 129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-goff-neb-1962.