State v. Goff

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

State v. Goff

199 S.E.2d 502, 19 N.C. App. 588, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1715

CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina

DecidedOctober 10, 1973

DocketNo. 734SC732

StatusPublished

This text of 199 S.E.2d 502 (State v. Goff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Goff, 199 S.E.2d 502, 19 N.C. App. 588, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1715 (N.C. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

BRITT, Judge.

We have carefully reviewed the record, and conclude that the trial court was properly organized, the bill of indictment against defendant is proper in form, the arraignment, plea and verdict meet the requirements, of law, the evidence fully justifies the verdict, the verdict supports the judgment, and the sentence imposed by the judgment is well within the limits prescribed by statute. State v. Tinsley, 279 N.C. 482, 183 S.E. 2d 669 (1971); G.S. 14-32(a).

No error.

Judges Morris and Hedrick concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRITT, Judge.

We have carefully reviewed the record, and conclude that the trial court was properly organized, the bill of indictment against defendant is proper in form, the arraignment, plea and verdict meet the requirements, of law, the evidence fully justifies the verdict, the verdict supports the judgment, and the sentence imposed by the judgment is well within the limits prescribed by statute. State v. Tinsley, 279 N.C. 482, 183 S.E. 2d 669 (1971); G.S. 14-32(a).

No error.

Judges Morris and Hedrick concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

199 S.E.2d 502, 19 N.C. App. 588, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1715, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-goff-ncctapp-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack