State v. Goff
199 S.E.2d 502, 19 N.C. App. 588, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1715
Opinion
We have carefully reviewed the record, and conclude that the trial court was properly organized, the bill of indictment against defendant is proper in form, the arraignment, plea and verdict meet the requirements, of law, the evidence fully justifies the verdict, the verdict supports the judgment, and the sentence imposed by the judgment is well within the limits prescribed by statute. State v. Tinsley, 279 N.C. 482, 183 S.E. 2d 669 (1971); G.S. 14-32(a).
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Goff, 199 S.E.2d 502, 19 N.C. App. 588, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1715 (N.C. Ct. App. 1973).
199 S.E.2d 502 (State v. Goff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Tinsley
183 S.E.2d 669 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1971)