State v. Gober

198 S.W.3d 207, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1200, 2006 WL 2358128
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 15, 2006
DocketWD 65686
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 198 S.W.3d 207 (State v. Gober) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Gober, 198 S.W.3d 207, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1200, 2006 WL 2358128 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

James C. Gober appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance contending that the trial court erred in overruling his motions for judgment of acquittal because insufficient evidence was presented of his possession. Gober contends the State failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he possessed cocaine.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wood v. Clements
198 S.W.3d 207 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
198 S.W.3d 207, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1200, 2006 WL 2358128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-gober-moctapp-2006.